"While some might mistakenly consider value investing a mechanical tool for identifying bargains, it is actually a comprehensive investment philosophy that emphasizes the need to perform in-depth fundamental analysis, pursue long-term investment results, limit risk, and resist crowd psychology." --Seth Klarman

TRUMP BUMP? DUMP! (November 20, 2024): On November 5, 2024, the U.S. held elections in which the Presidential winner was a Republican, while the Senate and House of Representatives ended up with majority Republican results. Before these elections, we already had by far the heaviest insider selling in the history of the U.S. stock market, the highest-ever valuations for most large-cap U.S. stocks, the highest-ever percentage of total U.S. assets invested in U.S. stocks, the highest-ever ratios of U.S. stock-market capitalization to U.S. GDP, and similar rare extremes which were above the 99th percentile.

There was a brief euphoric bounce to even higher levels which mostly peaked in the morning of Monday, November 11, 2024, less than one week following the elections. When a very overpriced asset temporarily becomes even more expensive, due primarily to emotional excitement, then this is historically an ideal selling opportunity. It works the opposite way too: when a very undervalued asset temporarily becomes even cheaper mainly for psychological reasons, this is one of the best times to make a purchase.

Gold mining and silver mining shares consistently complete tops and bottoms prior to most other stocks doing likewise.

During the 1999-2003 global equity bear market, HUI which is a fund of unhedged gold mining shares completed its bottom on November 15-16, 2000. This was almost two years before many other equities and their funds had bottomed on or near October 10, 2002. During the 2007-2009 bear market, gold mining shares were similarly among the earliest stock funds to complete their lowest points at or near the open on October 24, 2008. The S&P 500 didn't fall to its lowest point of 666.79 until March 6, 2009. It works the other way also: gold mining shares topped out in August 2020, well over a year before the Russell 2000 had completed its highest point in November 2021 and several years prior to the recent potential zenith for the S&P 500 Index.

Both GDX and GDXJ recently completed multi-year highs during the pre-market session on October 23, 2024. This pullback is likely to lead to losses for most other stock funds. Just as in past decades, GDX and GDXJ will be among the earliest exchange-traded funds to complete their lowest points for the cycle, perhaps in the first half of 2025. My guess is that both GDX and GDXJ will fall to bottoms which are between their early autumn 2022 lows and their early autumn 2023 lows. If this guess is wrong then it will probably be that one or both of these drop below their September 2022 bottoms to five-year nadirs. Assets including QQQ will probably fall to their lowest levels of 2025 several weeks to a few months afterward, possibly with QQQ dropping below 300, with QQQ thereafter enjoying a multi-month rebound which could carry it near 400 before resuming its bear market which might eventually end after many ups and downs around 2027 with QQQ below 100.

Emerging markets have been creating unheralded opportunities which might bottom around the spring and/or summer of 2025.

Emerging-market valuations relative to earnings are near their lowest-ever points of the past several decades, only briefly approached or surpassed during previous U.S. stock-market bubbles. Investors have become overly enamored with large-cap U.S. stocks and have therefore mostly sold their holdings in most other parts of the world to chase after dangerously overpriced U.S. shares. This has already created compelling opportunities. My main reason for waiting before buying is that the first major downward phase for large-cap U.S. shares will usually spill over into nearly all other stocks and corporate bonds in most of the world and in most sectors.

There are many possible worthwhile buying opportunities for emerging-market stock funds which may bottom roughly a half year from now near multi-year lows. Exchange-traded funds worth considering for purchase at that time may include EWZ, EWZS, and BRF (Brazil), VNM (Vietnam), EWW (Mexico), GXG (Colombia), IDX (Indonesia), and EPHE (Philippines).

Undervalued assets including TLT, FXY, and PALL have fallen to historic bottoms and have been forming several higher lows as is typical of the early stages of all true multi-year bull markets.

Just over one year ago, TLT fell to its lowest intraday point (81.92 at 5:40 a.m. on October 23, 2023) since June 15, 2004. Since then it has made several higher lows under 90. In July 2024 the Japanese yen fell to its lowest point since 1986 versus the U.S. dollar which can be purchased via the exchange-traded fund FXY. PALL, a fund of palladium bullion, dropped to 76.49 at 8:30:48 a.m. on August 5, 2024, thereby touching its lowest level since May 30, 2017, and since then forming several higher lows including 84.31 at 8:54:24 a.m. on November 14, 2024. The traders' commitments for all of the above three assets are demonstrating aggressive commercial accumulation which should lead to significantly higher prices over the next few years.

The U.S. dollar index has been rallying since September 27, 2024, which is generally negative for most stocks.

On September 27, 2024, the U.S. dollar index dropped to 100.514, its lowest point since July 20, 2023, and completing a two-year pullback which had begun from a two-decade top on September 28, 2022. Since then the U.S. dollar has been very strong with almost no media coverage. A powerful greenback is almost always followed by declines for most stocks and corporate bonds. Whenever the U.S. dollar index reaches an important peak and begins to form lower highs, which will likely occur sometime during 2025, this will signal that it is time to move progressively onto the long side with most equities and their funds.

We have achieved new all-time extremes between the 99th and 100th percentile for a wide range of valuation categories which have mostly been tracked for decades or longer.

The following charts highlight how large-cap U.S. stocks have been trading near all-time overvaluations even if you go all the way back to the founding of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange in 1790:

The CNN Fear & Greed Index reached 76 for one of the few times in its history:

Compared with the rest of the world, U.S. stocks haven't been more overpriced at least since 1950:

Investors have the most optimistic expectations for their U.S. stock investments since this survey began in 1987:

Using S&P 500 price to sales or price to book, we approached new all-time extremes for both in November 2024:

A measure of sentiment based upon quantitative indicators rather than a survey has shown the greatest-ever anticipation of future percentage gains for large-cap U.S. stocks:

2007 was the last year when the spreads between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasuries of identical maturities were as low as they have been recently:

Mark Hulbert has quantitatively compiled a list of indicators which have been used for decades to gauge the U.S. stock market's level of over- or undervaluation using percentile readings:

Investors currently have far too much of their money in U.S. stocks and not nearly enough in U.S. Treasuries:

Investors are shunning U.S. Treasuries and bank CDs paying 4.5% while putting money into QQQ paying 0.57%, because, just as with any historic bubble peak, they're certain they can "easily" make several times the difference with capital gains:

The bottom line: Investors years from now will look back at the current time and wonder why they weren't selling U.S. stocks much more aggressively, just as Warren Buffett and the top executives of many of the world's biggest companies have been doing during the past several months near all high points. Instead, investors have made all-time record deposits into large-cap U.S. stocks and have never been more overconfident about achieving future gains. The internet bubble ended with QQQ dropping 83.6% from its intraday peak of March 10, 2000 to its intraday bottom of October 10, 2002, 31 months later. However long the current bear market lasts won't be known except in hindsight, but now is an even more critical time to go against the crowd.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Below is my current asset allocation as of 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 20, 2024. Each position is listed as its percentage of my total liquid net worth.

I computed the exact totals for each position and grouped these according to sector.

The order is as follows: 1) U.S. government bonds; 2) shorts; 3) bear funds; 4) precious metals; 5) coins; 6) miscellaneous securities.

VMFXX/TIAA(Traditional)/bank CDs/FZDXX/FZFXX/SPRXX/SPAXX/BPRXX/Savings/Checking long: 37.36%;

17-Week/52-Week/26-Week/13-Week/2-Year/8-Week/3-Year/5,10-Year TIPS/4-Week/42-Day long/20-Year: 23.44%;

I Bonds long: 11.38%;

TLT long: 10.83%;

PMM long: 0.01%;

XLK short (all shorts are once again unhedged): 35.59%;

QQQ short: 25.58%;

SMH short: 1.50%;

AAPL short: 0.15%;

GDXJ short: 0.13%;

GDX short: 0.01%;

SARK long: 0.58%;

PSQ long: 0.04%;

PALL long: 1.49%;

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 7.71%;

FXY long: 0.80%.

"Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing." --Warren Buffett

RISKS WITHOUT REWARDS (September 29, 2024): In this U.S. Presidential year, far too many investors have been acting like seals and not the Presidential kind. They have become so accustomed to repeating the same tricks, piling over and over again into funds of U.S. large-cap stocks, that they aren't considering the risks they are taking relative to the rewards. You can get away with this kind of mindless approach with assets which are undervalued, since undervalued assets regardless of their so-called "reasons" will eventually rebound to fair value and you will do reasonably well. However, whenever assets are at or near the highest ends of their historical ranges, especially when they are wildly popular and overowned, you are going to come out behind even after decades of faithful Boglehead behavior.

It is time for investors to stop pretending that they have a divine right to come out ahead by brainlessly buying dangerously overvalued assets. By the time they realize their mistakes, they will lose half of their money or more. They should instead be primarily invested in U.S. government debt including U.S. Treasuries, I Bonds, and TIPS. Those who own "boring" U.S. government debt will have just about exactly 117 dollars near the end of 2027 for every 100 dollars that they have now. Those who are too lopsidedly invested in the shares of large U.S. companies, many of which are trading at four, five, or six times their historical average levels relative to profits, sales, and book value, will be far behind "boring" U.S. Treasury investors. This will be true not only three or four years from now, during which time the biggest losses will likely occur, but even thirty or forty years from now. This is proven by the historical record following previous bubble peaks which I will now describe in detail.

The Boglehead myth has recently been more thoroughly researched and decisively debunked.

If you invest in anything when it is underpriced then you have the wind at your back. The long-term upward trend will eventually work in your favor. However, if you buy something which is at the 99th or 100th percentile of overvaluation then you will be behind in real terms even after several decades. Edward McQuarrie researched the entire history of the U.S. stock market dating all the way back to 1793 to determine whether U.S. Treasuries or U.S. stocks achieve greater returns, and discovered that their total long-term performance has been nearly identical:

In the Long Run, Stocks Outperform Bonds, or Do They?

The best-known modern period of severe underperformance by U.S. equities had occurred from the September 1929 stock-market top to the August 1982 bottom. During this interval of nearly 53 years, the S&P 500 lost 38 percent after adjusting for inflation:

If this is backdated further to the previous century, then the period from June 30, 1851 through June 30, 1932 was accompanied by a 21% net loss for U.S. stocks in real terms during this 81-year span:

Of course you can also select numerous periods of time when the S&P 500 Index has impressively outperformed, especially if you begin from a starting point of notable undervaluation. Where you end is a function primarily of where you begin, not which asset you own. There is no magic which will cause you to "always be ahead in the long run," which is one of the most irrational and misguided conceits of Boglehead investors. Since we only live to be 100 years old or less, rather than 10 thousand years, it very much matters where we are in the cycle.

We are either at or near the 99th to 100th percentile for many U.S. equity valuation measures.

U.S. stocks, especially large-cap shares which have been by far the most popular with investors, have never been more overpriced in their entire history relative to current and future earnings than they have been during 2024 according to most reliable measures of valuation. Here are two charts which highlight their dangerous current levels:

The CNN Fear & Greed Index has rarely reached or exceeded 72 in its entire history:

The most important executive orders are the all-time record insider sales by the highest-ranking officers of U.S. companies.

In 2024 we have experienced all-time record insider selling by the top executives of large U.S. companies. This is not a coincidence; those who know the most about valuations and future profits are well aware that their companies' shares have never been more overpriced and will likely never be as overpriced again in their lifetimes and probably not in their children's lifetimes. That is why the total U.S. dollar volume of such selling is roughly twice the previous all-time record and is far above the average level of selling. Top executives have also done the least U.S. dollar volume of total insider buying in history during 2024:

Corporate Insiders Are Dumping Stock at the Fastest Rate in More Than a Decade

More aggressive investors who are aware of current record overvaluations, and who understand the risks they are taking, may choose to sell short.

It is possible to sell short assets which are at a high multiple of fair value including QQQ, or to purchase bear funds which do this including PSQ if you are less comfortable with short selling. It is essential to understand the potential risks and rewards with any kind of investment before taking such action. In addition, whenever you establish any position, you should always begin with a tiny percentage of your total liquid net worth and only add 125 dollars per trade for every one million dollars of your total liquid net worth. Many investors dangerously overtrade by doing amounts which are far too large, which will almost always give you a mathematically inferior average price.

Unlike long positions where you must surrender your U.S. Treasury bills to purchase those longs, short sellers can hold their Treasuries as collateral which will count almost as much as cash. You will also be paying the lowest dividends in history.

One little-appreciated advantage of selling short is that if you establish any long position then you have to give up the U.S. Treasury interest to make such a purchase. If you buy SPY, for example, then you are giving up 4.75% which you could get on 4- or 8-week U.S. Treasury bills, or similar yields on funds such as the Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund VMFXX, to get 1.18% in dividends which is the current 30-day SEC yield for SPY. It makes no sense to surrender 3.5%, because then you have to make 3.5% in capital gains just to break even, and that's not counting the fact that U.S. government debt is free of state and local income tax. If you are selling short and you use U.S. Treasury bills as your collateral, then those will count as 94% cash positions by SEC regulations. In other words, having 100 thousand dollars in U.S. Treasuries has the same marginable value as 94 thousand dollars in cash. You will thus be able to continue to collect interest so that if nothing happens in one year you will come out ahead compared with those who have long positions in the same securities. Since the SEC dividend yield for QQQ is 0.58% while short-term U.S. Treasury bills are yielding a blended average of 4.58%, the annualized net increase in your account per year will be exactly 4% if you are short QQQ and its components are unchanged in value.

U.S. Treasuries overall in October 2023 sported their highest yields since 2000. It makes much more sense to purchase assets which are at 23-year lows than to buy shares which have never been more overpriced since the beginning of the U.S. stock and Treasury markets in the late 1700s. Current U.S. Treasury yields have declined moderately from their 2023 peaks but remain well above their long-term historic averages. Investors have been shunning a guaranteed 4% to 5% annualized since, just as had been the case at previous bubble peaks including 1929, 1972, and 1999, they are overconfident about gaining 20% or more each year with large-cap U.S. stocks.

The behavior of the U.S. dollar index has been ignored by most investors even though it has been one of the most consistently reliable signals since it began trading at the start of 1972.

Only a small percentage of investors track the behavior of either the U.S. dollar index or the greenback relative to other global currencies. Historically the U.S. dollar tends to complete important peaks and thereafter make lower highs whenever U.S. stocks are set for significant uptrends, as we had most recently experienced when the U.S. dollar index completed a two-decade peak on September 26, 2022 and on earlier occasions before stock-market surges such as March 4, 2009 which was two days before the S&P 500 had ended its bear market on March 6, 2009 at 666.79. Symmetrically, the U.S. dollar index will often bottom and begin to form higher lows whenever U.S. equities are set for meaningful declines, as we had seen on numerous occasions including the important double bottom for the greenback in March and July 2008.

During the past several years the U.S. dollar completed a historic bottoming pattern in early 2021 before rallying to its highest point in more than two decades on September 26, 2022. This was followed by a two-year correction which either just ended or is approaching its final downward intraday spikes. There is no guarantee that the U.S. dollar can't drop further, but I expect to see it powerfully rally to its highest point since 1985 by 2027 or 2028. The next several months should also be accompanied by a generally rising U.S. dollar which will imply significantly lower prices for almost all other assets except for U.S. government debt.

Investors and most analysts have recently become as aggressively bullish toward gold and silver and the shares of their producers as they had been equally and staunchly bearish two years ago.

Investors consistently want to buy high and sell low, and this tends to be even more true in the precious metals sector where important tops and bottoms occur more frequently than they do for U.S. equity indices. Fortunately, just as with insider buying and selling, the U.S. government requires those who trade actual metals such as gold, silver, and platinum to register either as commercials, non-commercials, or small speculators. Commercials are those who own physical metal including miners, jewelers, and those who produce finished products from these metals. Non-commercials are hedge funds and others who manage money for other people. Small speculators are ordinary investors.

Commercials have rarely been more bearish toward gold, silver, and platinum than they are right now, only favoring palladium.

Historically, commercials gradually go net long whenever a particular asset is most likely to rise in price, and to gradually go net short whenever anything is most likely to decline in price. Not coincidentally, this trading approach is almost identical to my own method, partly since I based it upon long-term insider and commercial behavior. Recently the ratios of commercial short to commercial long positions for gold, silver, and platinum are near the highest-ever extremes of their multi-decade activity, meaning that those who are the most knowledgeable about precious metals are the most concerned about upcoming price declines and have been intensively hedging their inventory. This stands in stark contrast to most analysts and the media who have recently been especially bullish.

You can find the traders' commitments for silver, copper, and gold at the following link where it is updated each Friday at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time:

U.S. Government Traders' Commitments for Silver, Copper, Gold, and Others

Here are the traders' commitments for palladium and platinum:

U.S. Government Traders' Commitments for Palladium, Platinum, and Energy

With gold, commercials were most recently long 76,713 and short 416,419 contracts. Silver commercials showed 29,339 longs and 111,171 shorts, while platinum commercials had been long 15,715 and short 45,255. Palladium commercials were long 10,572 and short 3,941, the only one of the four precious metals with a high long-to-short ratio rather than the other way around.

To a somewhat lesser extent than we have experienced with insiders for large-cap U.S. stocks which have sold about twice as much as their previous all-time records, the executives of gold mining and silver mining companies have been recently selling gold mining and silver mining shares at their most aggressive pace since August 2020.

Just during the past several weeks we had insider sales for Royal Gold (RGLD) numerous times, in addition to Newmont Mining (NEM), Hecla Mining (HL) earlier in September 2024, and Apex Silver Mines (APXSQ). In spite of gold frequently achieving all-time highs, the shares of mining companies have been repeatedly struggling to surpass their recent highs and are far below their peaks from the summer of 2020 when gold was more than five hundred U.S. dollars per troy ounce lower than it is now. We have also experienced more frequent intraday highs occurring near the opening bell which is consistent with a topping pattern.

The bottom line: Investors are far too heavily laden with low net dividends and high downside risk for popular large-cap U.S. equity favorites when they should be embracing U.S. Treasuries which yield 4% more with zero risk and no state or local income taxes. Cryptocurrencies remain irrationally popular in spite of having been in downtrends for more than a half year and having no proven long-term intrinsic value. Real estate is eagerly desired for the precise reason that it should be avoided since valuations are roughly double fair value in the U.S. and had reached triple fair value in Canada before modest declines in real terms during the past 2-1/2 years. Gold and silver have thousands of years of proven intrinsic value, but these and the shares of their producers have become perilously trendy in recent months primarily because "they're going up so don't miss out." Commercials and top corporate insiders have rarely been more bearish toward precious metals except for palladium since their euphoric peaks in January 1980. If you are able to handle the uncertainty of selling short QQQ or buying PSQ then this can be a worthwhile speculation, while the vast majority of your total liquid net worth should be invested in U.S. government debt until valuations eventually become more compelling elsewhere.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Below is my current asset allocation as of 4:00 p.m. on Friday, September 27, 2024. Each position is listed as its percentage of my total liquid net worth.

I computed the exact totals for each position and grouped these according to sector.

The order is as follows: 1) U.S. government bonds; 2) shorts; 3) bear funds; 4) precious metals; 5) coins; 6) miscellaneous securities.

VMFXX/TIAA(Traditional)/bank CDs/FZDXX/FZFXX/SPRXX/SPAXX/BPRXX/Savings/Checking long: 37.56%;

17-Week/52-Week/26-Week/13-Week/2-Year/8-Week/3-Year/5,10-Year TIPS/4-Week/42-Day long/20-Year: 23.48%;

TLT long: 11.54%;

I Bonds long: 11.23%;

PMM long: 0.01%;

XLK short (all shorts are once again unhedged): 34.66%;

QQQ short: 24.50%;

SMH short: 1.53%;

AAPL short: 0.15%;

GDXJ short: 0.11%;

SARK long: 0.83%;

PSQ long: 0.04%;

PALL long: 1.44%;

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 7.64%;

FXY long: 0.72%.

"The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." --Warren Buffett

GDXJ: 48 TO 28 TO 58 (August 25, 2024): It is easy to determine whether to buy or sell precious metals because we have the huge advantage of knowing exactly what the insiders are doing both with the shares of the producers as well as with the futures contracts for the metals themselves. Recently we have experienced the heaviest selling by the top executives of gold mining and silver mining companies since the summer of 2020. The traders' commitments for gold, silver, and platinum show unusually bearish readings where the commercials (including jewelers, fabricators, and miners) who own physical metal have massive ratios of short to long positions. Meanwhile, hedge funds are sporting an all-time record ratio of gold longs (355,551) to gold shorts (64,298). We have also experienced GDXJ far underperforming GLD since July 2020, with GDXJ forming numerous lower highs including the past several weeks while gold bullion and GLD have frequently set new all-time highs.

A combination of recent insider selling of the shares of gold mining and silver mining shares, the shares underperforming bullion, commercials being heavily short gold futures, and hedge funds being heavily long gold futures are likely to be followed by much lower prices for both gold and silver. I expect gold to drop below two thousand U.S. dollars per troy ounce sometime during the next several months, and perhaps below 1800 if past patterns repeat themselves. Silver could drop toward or even below 20 U.S. dollars per troy ounce over the same time period. Almost all technical and fundamental analysts are asking how much higher gold can climb when they should be looking the opposite way.

You can find all of the traders' commitments at this site:

U.S. Government Traders' Commitments for Futures (go to Current Legacy Reports)

GDXJ is a fund of mid-cap gold mining shares.

For U.S. stocks overall, a fund like SPY or VOO represents the largest 500 companies while IWM tracks the Russell 2000 which are companies 1001 through 3000 by market capitalization. For precious metals mining, GDX represents the shares of the world's biggest gold mining and silver mining companies, while GDXJ covers the mid-cap holdings. There is some overlap between the smallest companies in GDX and the largest ones in GDXJ. Currently there is no true fund of small gold mining companies, although it would be useful to have such a fund available for trading.

Gold mining and silver mining shares generally lead gold bullion in both directions.

GDXJ reached a 7-1/2-year peak of 65.95 in August 2020. Since then it has formed lower highs of 51.92 in April 2022 and 49.13 on July 16-17, 2024. Gold bullion is much higher today than it had been at any of these previous times, but the shares of gold mining and silver mining shares have not responded positively. Historically, gold mining and silver mining shares usually lead gold bullion in both directions. For example, in September 2022, GDXJ slid to a 2-1/2-year bottom of 25.80. From September through November 2022, as GDXJ formed several higher lows, gold bullion and GLD kept dropping to lower lows, with gold eventually bottoming in November 2022 at 1621.50 U.S. dollars per troy ounce. Before precious metals can once again move meaningfully higher in tandem with the shares of their producers, we will likely once again see gold mining and silver mining shares outperforming gold bullion instead of underperforming it as it has done in recent years. We will also likely see insider buying instead of insider selling. We should also see the traders' commitments with silver commercials being either net long or approximately neutral instead of being heavily net short as they are now.

Especially whenever the U.S. dollar is strongly rallying against currencies such as the euro over the next several months, GDXJ will likely once again drop below 30 as it has done many times since its inception.

There is no way to know whether GDXJ will bottom near 20 or 30 during the upcoming year, but it will likely be somewhere in between those levels and perhaps near its September 2022 bottom of 25.80. As with all investments, it is essential to use a ladder consisting of dozens or even hundreds of very small good-until-canceled purchase orders placed months in advance to gradually accumulate it, since no one can possibly know with any accuracy when the bottom will occur or at approximately what price. I already have numerous orders to begin buying GDXJ near 29 and to buy it more and more aggressively the lower it drops, just as I have done repeatedly in past decades. I first began buying gold mining shares via the fund BGEIX in 1988 when it was possible to purchase 50 dollars per day of this fund with zero commissions.

Bubble collapses for large-cap U.S. stocks almost always feature initial substantial losses for gold mining and silver mining shares, followed by dramatic percentage gains.

During the previous U.S. large-cap bubble collapse at the beginning of the century for the internet bubble, QQQ topped out on March 10, 2000 prior to plummeting 83.6% by October 10, 2002. Gold mining shares and their indices/funds such as HUI bottomed on or near November 15-16, 2000 which was a little more than eight months later. We can never be sure about timing. However, it seems likely that we began or are about to begin a similar collapse for large-cap U.S. shares for the same reasons of dangerous overvaluation and even more intense selling of their shares by top executives than we had in 1999-2000. Gold mining and silver mining shares will likely retreat to their lowest levels since the autumn of 2022 and perhaps even lower than that, toward but probably above their March 2020 bottoms. The next bottoming process for GDXJ and similar shares will likely be completed either near the end of 2024 or during the early months of 2025.

If we look again at HUI, then if you had purchased its equivalent at its November 2000 bottom then it was multiplied by a factor of more than seven in three years. We can't say for sure how much it might gain under a similar bubble collapse, but even if GDXJ "only" doubles then this would be a superior rate of return. GDXJ has already proven its ability to rebound from depressed levels, having more than tripled within less than one year from its bottoms in January 2016 and March 2020. The key, as always, is to buy something whenever everyone else is despondent and is selling it rather than when everyone is excited about the prospect of additional all-time highs.

Whenever the most people are invested in any asset, it consistently performs the worst; when the fewest people want to own anything, it dramatically outperforms:

Besides being overloved, U.S. large-cap stocks are absurdly overpriced relative to profits, sales, or any other benchmarks:

U.S. equity fund managers have become dangerously overconfident about investors not making future redemptions, thereby reducing their cash percentages to all-time record lows. If investors become worried, they will quickly use up this cash and force these fund managers to sell their stocks to meet higher-than-expected redemptions:

Costco's price-earnings ratio once again surpassed 55.

Instead of focusing on extremely overpriced shares including Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Tesla, Amazon, and other well-known tech names, it is even more interesting to look at Costco. Costco can't possibly create a revolutionary new product: its business model is people driving their cars to a huge parking lot, purchasing reasonably-priced items which Costco had obtained with favorable wholesale deals, and then bringing those items home. Costco has been around since 1983 which is more than forty years. The current price-earnings ratio for Costco is "only" about five times its historic average while its profit growth has been very steady through the decades.

There are two possible scenarios: 1) extraterrestrial beings arrive from other galaxies with their minds focused on purchasing as much from Costco as they can get, thereby quintupling Costco's profit growth; or 2) the price-earnings ratio for Costco collapses 80% or more to restore it to its long-term historic average. Take your pick.

In spite of the heaviest insider selling and the lowest put-call ratios in history for the largest U.S. stocks, investors who are not top corporate executives have been doing much more buying than selling.

In hindsight, investors will look back at this period of dangerous overvaluation for popular large-cap U.S. stocks and wonder why they didn't do some selling. The reason is that the media keep brainwashing you into putting even more of your retirement money into the most dangerously overvalued assets. Other assets like residential real estate, high-yield corporate bonds, and cryptocurrencies are also near all-time record overvaluations, but more people are interested in adding than subtracting.

Investors are far too eager to take risks which are wildly out of proportion with the potential rewards. They are not nearly eager enough to desire guaranteed gains with zero risk. The result will therefore be exactly the same as it has been for every bubble throughout history.

There are bargains out there, although they could become even better bargains.

Unlike gold, silver, and platinum, for which commercials have high ratios of short to long positions, palladium shows commercials with an even bigger ratio of longs to shorts. You can buy palladium using the ticket symbol PALL. Other unpopular shares include stocks in countries like China, Brazil, and Vietnam, with Chinese shares having suffered a bear market which has persisted for more than 3-1/2 years from its February 2021 top. Rare-earth metals producers and their funds including REMX are also notably out of favor. As the popular U.S. stocks slide 40% or 50% from their recent highs within a year, these losses will most likely initially spill over into almost all other assets as many investors sell first and ask questions later. However, just as they had done during 1999-2003, investors will eventually differentiate between sectors and will begin to purchase the most undervalued shares. Gold mining and silver mining shares, after they complete much greater losses, could be among the first to complete their bear-market bottoms several months from now just as they had done in November 2000.

U.S. Treasury bills are especially compelling, as Warren Buffett well knows.

Investors have been shunning U.S. Treasury bills of 3 months or less which yield 5% or more guaranteed with exemption from state and local income tax, even though those yields are generally the highest since 2000. They have also been avoiding longer-term U.S. Treasuries which yield more than 4% including the 20-year U.S. Treasury. The main reason is that they think that getting 4% or 5% guaranteed explicitly by the U.S. government is less than the 10%, 20%, or 30% that they'll surely achieve through large-cap U.S. stocks which in their opinion "only go up in the long run." This is the exact same mistake that investors made in 1999-2000, and previously near other peaks prior to severe U.S. equity bear markets. Instead of ending up with a three-year increase of 17% compounded and partially tax-exempt, they will end up with only 17% of their money if they are invested in QQQ.

The U.S. dollar has fallen sharply out of favor and is likely getting ready to move significantly higher versus nearly all currencies except the Japanese yen.

The U.S. dollar has been trading at its lowest point versus many currencies since around the end of 2023. Most analysts expect the U.S. dollar to continue lower, but it will likely rally powerfully within the next three to four years to reach its highest point since its all-time peaks of 1985. This is partly since investors will be fleeing U.S. stocks, cryptocurrencies, and high-yield corporate bonds. Currently unpopular U.S. Treasuries and the U.S. dollar will benefit just as they had done during past bubble collapses including 2000-2002.

The Japanese yen is an important exception, having fallen several weeks ago to its lowest point versus the U.S. dollar since 1986. The yen will likely continue to rebound until it is much closer to fair value. Just as it didn't make sense for Japan to have the most expensive cost of living and housing prices in the world as it did in the late 1980s, it makes even less sense for Japan to have the lowest cost of living of any industrialized country and among the lowest housing prices worldwide as has been the case in 2024.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Below is my current asset allocation as of 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 23, 2024. Each position is listed as its percentage of my total liquid net worth.

I computed the exact totals for each position and grouped these according to sector.

The order is as follows: 1) U.S. government bonds; 2) shorts; 3) bear funds; 4) precious metals; 5) coins; 6) miscellaneous securities.

VMFXX/TIAA(Traditional)/bank CDs/FZDXX/FZFXX/SPRXX/SPAXX/BPRXX/Savings/Checking long: 37.44%;

17-Week/52-Week/26-Week/13-Week/2-Year/8-Week/3-Year/5,10-Year TIPS/4-Week/42-Day long/20-Year: 23.31%;

TLT long: 11.52%;

I Bonds long: 11.10%;

PMM long: 0.01%;

XLK short (all shorts are once again unhedged): 34.49%;

QQQ short: 24.16%;

SMH short: 1.53%;

AAPL short: 0.14%;

GDXJ short: 0.08%;

SARK long: 0.91%;

PSQ long: 0.04%;

PALL long: 1.35%;

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 7.33%;

FXY long: 0.71%.

"The inability to hold cash and the pressure to be fully invested at all times meant that when the plug was pulled out of the tub, all boats dropped as the water rushed down the drain." --Seth A. Klarman

NINE ALIGN; BENIGN? NEIN! (April 2, 2024): We have recently experienced several simultaneous extremes which investors are ignoring due largely to two key factors: 1) investors will almost always believe that whatever has occurred in recent months will continue over the next several months, regardless of the merits of such a momentum argument; and 2) the Goldilocks myth of a "soft landing" has become so widely prevalent that the vast majority of individual investors in their retirement plans and hedge funds have become dangerously overcrowded into the most popular U.S. stocks. Nearly 100% of equity valuations are at or near all-time record overpricings, while many reliable signals of upcoming market behavior have approached or surpassed all-time record extremes.

Many investors apparently weren't paying attention in kindergarten. They should have learned that Goldilocks is always followed by the three bears. Mama Bear is backstage now, already cued up and ready to make her dramatic entrance. Speaking of cue, the most overvalued assets including QQQ are likely to lose one-third or more of their recent peak valuations, which would imply QQQ dropping below 300 at least briefly during the next twelve months. In the final months of 2022, all forecasters of the U.S. economy insisted that there would be a U.S. recession. Now almost none of them expect a recession. They're going to be as wrong in 2024 as they had been in 2023.

Several reliable signals have been flashing bright red.

All of the following warnings are close to their most extreme levels ever recorded: 1) we have the lowest-ever put valuations and the lowest overall "skew" of put valuations relative to call valuations since options began trading on the CBOE at the start of 1973; 2) we have the longest-ever inverted U.S. Treasury yield curve and we had recently experienced the most-inverted Treasury curve in its entire history going all the way back to 1789; 3) the U.S. dollar amount of insider selling divided by the U.S. dollar amount of insider buying set a new all-time record during the first quarter of 2024; 4) investor inflows set several historic records including the largest-ever weekly inflow into U.S. exchange-traded equity funds during March 2024; 5) most measures of valuation which had been favored by classic value analysts including Benjamin Graham and Seth Klarman either approached or surpassed all-time records going back to 1790 when the Philadelphia Stock Exchange had its debut; 6) we have experienced the greatest-ever divergences between the most popular large-cap U.S. shares and just about everything else worldwide; 7) investor sentiment is close to multi-decade peaks; 8) perhaps most importantly, far more investors are concerned about missing out on future gains than they are about losing money in the financial markets.

No trigger has even been needed to begin either a massive collapse or a major rally. Follow the insiders whenever their trading is near a rare extreme in either direction.

Whenever someone asks me which event will trigger a massive percentage loss for QQQ and related assets, the answer is best encapsulated in the following question: what triggered the 83.6% drop for QQQ starting on March 10, 2000? What "caused" the even larger percentage losses beginning in September 1929? How about January 1973 or the 19th-century bubbles which had begun collapses in 1837 and 1873? In other words, the financial markets have never been and will never become cause-and-effect processes. Whenever valuations for any asset are either unusually high or low relative to fair value, anything can spontaneously initiate a regression toward the mean and beyond. I had to laugh when I saw the news articles on Tuesday about why U.S. stock futures were lower. All of them related to events which had occurred over the weekend or on Monday during market hours. Can't the market respond immediately? Investors tend to forget that during the subprime mortgage housing price bubble collapse of 2007, which had begun in January of that year, most equity sectors kept climbing at first. The S&P 500 didn't peak until October 11, 2007, long after the subprime news was already widely known. Other analysts pegged the collapse of Lehman Brothers as the trigger, even though that occurred in September 2008. Probably that helped to accelerate a much later phase of the downtrend but it had already been in place for a long time.

Top corporate executives are well aware of this principle. They don't waste time debating what could "trigger" any future event in the financial markets. The reason that top executives overall and especially in the most-overpriced sectors have been selling at their most intense pace in history is because they are close to being pure value investors. They know better than anyone what fair value is for the company which they are helping to run, and when current valuations have deviated the most from this level. That is why insiders consistently buy aggressively near bottoms and persistently sell near tops. They are often "wrong" in the short run but they are rarely off the mark in the long run.

The unusually lengthy interval since the last true bear market encourages investors to believe that the next bear market is emotionally far away, even as it is much more likely to happen.

Many people including myself remain puzzled why the U.S. Federal Reserve didn't immediately begin to raise the overnight lending rates shortly after the U.S. Presidential election near the end of 2020. The real reason is probably that, not having experienced significant U.S. inflation since the early 1980s, most people on the Fed really couldn't imagine inflation surging the way it ultimately did. Similarly, with the last true U.S. equity downtrend ending in early March 2009, it seems psychologically to most investors that bear markets were something which happened a long time ago and are no longer a serious possibility.

The level of surprise is therefore going to be quite high whenever we undergo the largest percentage losses in over fifteen years for most U.S. stocks. Just about everyone has concluded that huge exchange-traded equity fund inflows will continue for many more years, that VIX will keep dropping below 13 for many more years, and similar "obvious" conclusions. George Santayana stated that those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat it. My corollary is that those who do remember the past, but believe that "it's different this time," deserve to repeat it.

We have already been in bear markets for years, but hardly anyone pays attention to them because they don't involve the most popular shares.

The stock market in China began its downtrend during the second week of February 2021. Most small- and mid-cap U.S. shares also completed their tops in 2021, and even recently the Russell 2000 (IWM), after a strong rebound since October 2023, wasn't able to approach its high of February 2021, much less its brief spike higher in November 2021 when most U.S. stocks by count touched their highest points of their bull markets which had begun from the depths of March 2020. Since most investors don't track these or other emerging-market indices, or baskets of thousands of U.S. stocks, but only pay attention to the most well-known names, they are convinced that there is a solid uptrend for the entire U.S. stock market.

The most impressive percentage increases above fair value are inherently unsustainable, and are therefore consistently followed by the most impressive percentage declines.

You could argue that the rally for AI shares and related large-cap popular names since October 2023 has been impressive, and it has in the same way that the large-cap popular rally diverged from everything else and was impressive in September 1929, January 1973, and March 2000. However, all extremes come to an end sooner or later because the basic Boglehead premise is fatally flawed. There is a long-term uptrend to any asset, just as there may be a long-term uptrend in the temperature due to global warming, but that doesn't mean you throw away your snow shovels and winter tires in July and expect the weather to keep getting hotter. Mean regression has been proven by Benjamin Graham and Seth Klarman and many other value investors throughout history to be a much stronger force than the long-term uptrend, especially whenever the current distance from the mean in either direction is unusually extreme. That is why we had such powerful multi-year rallies which began in late 2002 and early 2003, and again in late 2008 and early 2009. It is the primary reason why we must experience an approximate repeat of the internet bubble over the next few years.

I am surprised how few analysts have pointed out the obvious parallels between the internet bubble of 1999-2003 and the current AI bubble 24 years later.

Usually nothing repeats exactly in the financial markets, although bubble collapses are so similar to each other that if I were to remove the X and Y axes on charts of the railroad bubble of the 1870s and the internet bubble from the early part of this century, and ask you to tell me which was which, I would challenge you to get it correct. In this case, however, we have almost an exact parallel in several ways, including the dramatic outperformance of the most popular large-cap shares in late 1999 and early 2000 which is almost exactly analogous to late 2023 and early 2024, almost to the exact day.

March 2000 is remarkably similar to March 2024. Nonetheless, most investors use the period from October 2023 through March 2024 as their guide to the next several months, rather than looking at what had occurred after March 2000 or January 1973 or September 1929.

In some cases the parallel is to the exact day, or as exact as it can be. The internet bubble for the Nasdaq and QQQ had topped out on March 10, 2000. This would have been impossible to occur on March 10, 2024, as it was a Sunday. However, on March 8, 2024, both XLK (a fund of popular tech shares) and SMH (a fund of semiconductors) may have completed their peaks for the cycle. QQQ could have done so later on March 21, 2024. In 2020, the S&P 500 Index (SPX) continued to receive inflows mainly from individuals in their retirement plans even after tech shares had topped out, causing SPX to reach its highest point so far on March 28, 2024. In 2000, the S&P 500 similarly experienced a delayed zenith on March 24, 2000. That's about as close as you're going to get in real life. This doesn't guarantee that QQQ will drop 83.6% as it had done from its top on March 10, 2000 until its bottom 31 months later on October 10, 2002, but it has to be a realistic possibility especially since by many measures this index was more overpriced in March 2024 than it had been in March 2000.

We have ended or are near the top of the sixth U.S. stock-market bubble in its history. It will collapse the same as the previous five.

In the 1830s investors insisted that since we never had canals before, we wouldn't experience a severe U.S. equity bear market regardless of how overpriced many of the canal shares had become by 1837. The same fairy tale was popular in the 1870s regarding railroad stocks, in the 1920s about industrialization, in the early 1970s regarding the popularization of computers, in the late 1990s with the internet, and now in modern times with AI. All of these involved huge societal changes, but they had zero net impact on the financial markets because the financial markets have always followed and will always follow the same basic principles. If a company has a certain level of profit, and that profit is increasing by a certain percentage, then regardless of whether you're living in 1824 or 1924 or 2024 you can compute how much that stock should be trading for. If investors are depressed or excited about investing, thereby distorting this number in either direction, it creates an opportunity for alert investors who recognize that all such distortions are temporary and will eventually fluctuate toward nearly equal and opposite extremes. During the late 1920s Benjamin Graham repeatedly insisted upon this key point even with loud Bogleheads like Irving Fisher insisting upon the Boglehead point of view even before it had that name. The worst bear market in world history proved that mean reversion will always triumph at any extreme, no matter how "permanent" famous analysts claim that it is.

We don't just have an AI or large-cap bubble, although that exists and is especially dangerous. We have simultaneous perilous overvaluations for cryptocurrencies, gold, residential real estate, and many other assets. The percentage loss of total worldwide net worth is probably going to experience one of its biggest-ever declines in history.

During previous historic bubbles including Tulipmania nearly four centuries ago in Amsterdam, it wasn't just tulips which collapsed in price. There had been simultaneous bubbles for residential real estate, the stock market, and numerous related assets which are not generally remembered by most people but which can be reviewed in detail for free online at "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" by Charles Mackay. Residential real estate is overpriced for the same fundamental reason as U.S. large-cap stocks: the ratio of housing prices to average household income in many countries including the United States is close to double its long-term average level. People's incomes in real terms are not going to suddenly double, which means that housing prices will have to fall by half in real terms. Gold has probably been in a long-term uptrend since August 1999, but the traders' commitments for both gold and silver, showing commercials net short about 2.7 to 1 for each, are a warning sign that the most-experienced investors who own actual gold and silver as miners, fabricators, jewelers, and so on, are betting on the price dropping. Gold will probably fall by a minimum of 400 dollars an ounce from wherever it is topping out in this cycle, and perhaps by more than 500 dollars, while silver will likely drop below 20 U.S. dollars per ounce at least briefly later in 2024. Once silver commercials go net long, as they almost did in March 2023 and had actually done in September 2022, it will be time to buy into this sector in the anticipation of a powerful rally.

As for cryptocurrencies, no one has any idea what they are worth. At least a stock with a price-earnings ratio of 50 will become a bargain when its P/E drops below 8, but any given cryptocurrency is only worth whatever someone else believes that it's worth. Peter Pan is one of my favorite children's stories by J.M. Barrie, but you can't use Peter Pan logic to justify any investment.

The following charts highlight rare multi-decade extremes from reliable media sources, some of which became their most exaggerated in a century.

The bottom line: the most popular shares as a group, as are epitomized by funds including QQQ and XLK, have been making many upward spikes since February 12, 2024 but haven't been able to remain above those key intraday highs. Hedge funds, which by far had been their most net long any asset in history when they had dangerously overcrowded into AI shares and related large-cap U.S. favorites, will likely curtail their buying or actually do some net selling, although as usual with more than 90% of hedge funds they won't become serious sellers until these and related funds have already dropped 15% or 20% from their respective March 2024 tops. We will continue to experience frequent sharp upward bounces for U.S. stocks for about three years, with some of those rebounds for QQQ approaching or exceeding 50%, but during that time all of the major indices will join the Russell 2000 in primary downtrends which almost certainly means a loss of more than 70% from its peak for the S&P 500 Index and more than 80% for funds of the most popular shares including QQQ. During the next twelve months, when hardly anyone is anticipating a significant drop for the U.S. stock market, QQQ will likely at least briefly spike sharply below 300 before recovering. Over the longer run, QQQ is likely to fall below 100 and perhaps much lower by 2027 or sooner. This will surprise most investors, but compared with its October 2002 or November 2008 bottoms it would be a very similar "Papa" bear-market bottom adjusting for inflation and earnings.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Below is my current asset allocation as of 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 2, 2024. Each position is listed as its percentage of my total liquid net worth.

I computed the exact totals for each position and grouped these according to sector.

The order is as follows: 1) U.S. government bonds; 2) shorts; 3) bear funds; 4) gold/silver mining; 5) coins; 6) miscellaneous securities.

VMFXX/TIAA(Traditional)bank CDs/FZDXX/FZFXX/SPRXX/SPAXX/Savings/Checking long: 37.13%;

26-Week/17-Week/52-Week/13-Week/2-Year/8-Week/3-Year/5,10-Year TIPS/4-Week/42-Day long: 21.66%;

I Bonds long: 10.88%;

TLT long: 10.86%;

PMM long: 0.01%;

XLK short (all shorts once again unhedged): 30.58%;

QQQ short: 20.17%;

XLE short: 5.48%;

XLI short: 3.05%;

XLV short: 1.82%;

SMH short: 1.33%;

AAPL short: 0.03%;

SARK long: 0.88%;

PSQ long: 0.04%;

PALL long: 0.17%;

GDXJ long: 0.14% (fully hedged with covered calls at a strike price of 45);

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 7.01%;

FXY long: 0.24%.

"At some price, an asset is a buy, at another it's a hold, and at another it's a sell." --Seth A. Klarman

2023 ALL-TIME DANGER (May 3, 2023): In 2021 we achieved especially dangerous all-time record unprecedented investor behavior. In the U.S. we had greater net inflows into U.S. equity funds in 2021 than in 2001 through 2020 combined. We also experienced all of the following all-time record extremes from early 2021 through early 2022: 1) the ratio of the total dollar volume of insider selling divided by the total dollar volume of insider buying; 2) the ratio of the top 50 U.S. companies by market capitalization relative to the entire U.S. stock market; 3) the ratio of the total market capitalization of the top 50 U.S. companies relative to the total U.S. GDP; 4) the overall valuation of the top 50 U.S. companies relative to the total market capitalization of the the rest of the world; 5) the total volume of call buying; 6) the average daily net inflow into U.S. passive large-cap equity funds; 7) the divergence in behavior between the most-experienced investors who had never been heavier net sellers especially of the biggest U.S. company shares, versus the least-experienced participants who had never been more aggressive net buyers of U.S. equities.

This article on Bloomberg from November 25, 2021, which doesn't even include the huge net inflows from the past several weeks of that year, highlights how investors became far too heavily committed to U.S. stocks at the worst possible time in history:

Stock Funds Took in More Cash in 2021 Than Two Decades Combined

2023 has smashed all previous U.S. large-cap stock-market extremes including those of 2021 and 2022.

It was truly amazing to have all of the previous extremes surpassed for all previous U.S. large-cap equity bubbles including 1837, 1873, 1929, 1973, and 2000. I was convinced that we might never see such overenthusiasm, overinvesting, and overcommitment to the biggest U.S. stocks for another century or more. However, it didn't take a century to revisit these all-time distortions, as every single one of the above all-time records from 2021-2022 was surpassed in 2023.

Practically every week we get a new all-time record or two: 1) the lowest VIX (15.53) during a bear market; 2) the longest rebound from an intermediate-term bottom during a bear market (nearly 7 months); 3) frequent record ratios of the biggest U.S. megacap shares relative to the rest of the S&P 500 or relative to other indices of small- and mid-cap U.S. shares. The last statistic is especially ominous, since the degree of overcrowding into the biggest U.S. companies has consistently been proportional to the subsequent total percentage losses for the best-known U.S. equity indices and funds. The following three charts highlight the astonishing enthusiasm for the biggest U.S. companies in recent weeks:

If U.S. Treasuries are paying over 5% guaranteed with the interest exempt from state and local income taxes, how can other investments compete?

The simple answer is that on a rational or analytical basis there is no reason to purchase U.S. stocks, real estate, art, collectibles, or anything else if you can get 5% or more on U.S. Treasury bills. Only emotional reasons would justify purchasing fluctuating assets, especially since so many of those are trading near all-time record overvaluations and as described earlier in this update have rarely been more popular.

The 17-week U.S. Treasury bill usually sports among the highest yields of all U.S. Treasuries since it has only existed since October 2022 and many institutions aren't aware of it. This is a far more intelligent choice than putting money into absurdly-overpriced U.S. large-cap equity funds including QQQ, XLK, and SPY.

The U.S. Federal Reserve is trying to slow the U.S. economy. Do you really think they'll fail in that pursuit?

The U.S. Federal Reserve has just raised both of its key overnight lending rates by a total of five percent over a relatively short time period in order to slow the U.S. economy. Regardless of whether there is a soft landing or not, current valuations especially for the largest U.S. stocks aren't compatible with contracting economic growth. We don't need to have a recession in order to have a stock-market crash, since merely returning to fair value will produce massive percentage losses. Moreover, bear markets almost always bottom at a 30% to 50% discount to fair value.

Gold mining and silver mining shares are often among the earliest assets to complete both tops and bottoms in any cycle. History always repeats itself with minor variations.

Even though the price of spot gold almost exactly revisited its all-time high from August 2020, the prices of gold mining and silver mining shares remained dramatically below their peaks from that month. This served as an important negative divergence to warn us that, even though this sector is traditionally one of the strongest bear-market performers, for some period of weeks or months we are going to experience a meaningful correction in this sector which has been underway since April 13, 2023.

Funds including GDXJ and GDX are likely to complete their bottoms ahead of nearly all other risk assets over the next several months. Gold has repeatedly failed to remain above 2050 U.S. dollars per troy ounce, including a failed attempt on Wednesday, May 3, 2023, and will likely drop below 1800 before resuming its long-term uptrend which has been in effect since the beginning of this century. After gold mining and silver mining shares complete their pullbacks and begin to rebound, the clock will be ticking for most other stocks which will fall to multi-year lows over the subsequent several weeks or months.

The biggest losses for U.S. stocks will be in 2024-2025, not in 2023. However, we are going to drop a lot more in 2023 than even many bearish analysts are anticipating.

In 2024-2025 U.S. stocks are likely to return to their levels of 2013 and perhaps even 2012. In 2023 we generally won't approach or drop below most of the March 2020 bottoms, because it's not yet timely for such an event to occur. Bear markets are like avalanches: they start out slowly and build up momentum on the way down. All pullbacks are followed by powerful recoveries, each of which convinces most investors that the bear market is over and we're in a new bull market. If you don't believe this then check how many times during the past 1-1/2 years Jim Cramer has insisted that the bear market has ended. Each time he and many other analysts became convinced that "the bear market is over", a renewed, ferocious downturn ensued.

A reasonable 2023 downside target for QQQ would be 200 or 190, and I think we will go lower than that before the end of this calendar year. This should be followed by a rebound of perhaps 40% over a period of several months, after which we will begin a much more severe downtrend.

U.S. equity indices keep making upward spikes as is characteristic of an intermediate-term topping pattern in a bear market.

QQQ briefly surged to intraday highs of 323.63 on May 1, 2023 and 322.47 on May 3, 2023. Topping patterns within bear markets feature repeated attempts to stage upside breakouts, just as bottoming patterns within bear markets are accompanied by repeated sharp downward moves. Investors tend to be easily fooled into believing that repeated upward intraday surges are bullish when they are profoundly bearish.

VIX fell to 15.53 at 11:02 and 11:03 a.m. on Monday, May 1, 2023 for the first time since November 5, 2021.

In past bear markets, multi-month low extremes for VIX were an important sell signal. Similarly, when VIX climbs to a multi-year high and then begins to form lower highs, as I think will be the case much later in 2023, this is a useful buy signal for U.S. equities and their funds.

Investors are repeating the same recency-bias mistake as the Fed had done in 2020.

Why did the Fed wait so long before starting to increase overnight lending rates? Didn't they notice that the U.S. stock market was approaching record bubble levels near the end of 2020? Of course they did, but the deciding factor in not raising rates at that time or in early 2021 was because we hadn't experienced a true inflationary binge since the early 1980s which was forty years earlier. If something hasn't happened for a long time, you start to believe that it's highly unlikely to reoccur even if it is by far the most probable outcome.

Investors are making the same serious mistake today. They're not putting most of their money into U.S. Treasury bills, in most cases not because they aren't aware how overpriced megacap U.S. shares are today (although some are simply ignorant), but because we haven't experienced a crushing bear market since early March 2009 which was more than 14 years ago. Anything which is that far in the past seems psychologically as though it can't happen again, even though it is by far the most likely outcome.

The U.S. dollar index has been making higher lows since early 2021. The correction from the last week of September 2022 essentially ended at the beginning of February 2023 and we have been experiencing higher lows in preparation for a dramatic move higher for the greenback over the next several months.

I keep reading about how I should invest in anticipation of a falling U.S. dollar. As with most media coverage this is badly misguided. One of the major risks to the global economy is that the U.S. dollar, which reached its highest point in September 2022 in more than twenty years, is likely to achieve a 40-year zenith within two or three years. Bet on a rising U.S. dollar, not a falling one.

Investors are overly concerned about commercial real estate and are not nearly concerned enough about residential real estate.

Work-at-home popularity in recent years, encouraging companies to lease significantly less office space, has become widely broadcast and Charlie Munger was recently featured as highlighting this point. This phenomenon is probably more than built into current valuations for commercial real estate and associated REITs. Investors are ignoring the far more dangerous all-time record ratios of residential real estate in most neighborhoods to the average household incomes in those neighborhoods. Eventually residential real estate, like all other assets, must regress to fair value as measured by the average long-term ratios of housing prices to household incomes. This implies a 50% average decline for houses in most U.S. cities over the next few years if you don't adjust for inflation. If U.S. stocks end up mostly completing historic nadirs in 2025 then real estate might complete its bottoming process in 2025-2027 as residential housing prices tend to retreat to important lows a year or two later than the equity market.

The bottom line: 2023 has experienced even more dangerous extremes than 2021 or 2022, and those had been among the most-overvalued episodes in U.S. history for large-cap U.S. equities.

We can debate how much lower QQQ, XLK, and similar assets are likely to drop over the next 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 years. I feel pretty confident that QQQ will eventually trade below 80 which would not even be as large a total percentage decline as its 83.6% collapse from its March 10, 2000 top to its October 10, 2002 bottom. This would represent a slide of 75% for QQQ from its current level. Other funds which are laden with heavy weightings in the largest U.S. companies will suffer proportional declines.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Below is my current asset allocation as of 4:00 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 2023.

The order is as follows: 1) U.S. government bonds; 2) shorts; 3) gold/silver mining; 4) coins; 5) individual securities.

TIAA(Traditional)/VMFXX/FZDXX/Savings/Checking long: 26.44%;

26-Week/17-Week/52-Week/2-Year/8-Week/3-Year/5,10-Year TIPS long: 13.02%;

I Bonds long: 9.35%;

TLT long: 9.04%;

XLK short (all shorts are currently unhedged): 21.45%;

QQQ short: 8.74%;

XLE short: 4.59%;

XLI short: 2.37%;

XLV short: 1.62%;

SMH short: 0.69%;

GDXJ long: 11.45%;

ASA long: 7.33%;

GDX long: 3.25%;

BGEIX long: 1.59%;

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 6.10%;

HBI long: 0.31%;

EWZ long: 0.20%;

EWZS long: 0.08%;

PAK long: 0.02%;

EGPT long: 0.01%.

The numbers add up to more than 100% because short positions only require 25% to 30% collateral in stocks/funds and less than that in U.S. Treasuries (by SEC regulations; some brokers require more) to hold them with no margin required.

"Patience and discipline can make you look foolishly out of touch until they make you look prudent and even prescient." --Seth A. Klarman

TRAPPED BOGLEHEADS (March 22, 2023): If it doesn't rain outside for several weeks in a row then you may stop taking an umbrella with you even when it's cloudy. As a result you'll get rained on sooner or later. Worse, if the lack of rain continues for years then you may start building houses without roofs. Then you'll have a catastrophe. Investors have been building portfolios in the same manner, ensuring that they'll be flooded and thoroughly ruined sooner or later. The water is already coming in and they're not even putting on plastic blue roofs.

We had such a lengthy bull market that, even with the overall mediocre 23-year performance for U.S. large-cap equity index funds since March 2000, investors who made foolish decisions were generally rewarded instead of punished. Those who used margin, or who kept piling blindly into U.S. equity growth funds in classic Boglehead style, or who simply purchased shares of the best-known big U.S. companies, generally outperformed those who used more scientific methods. Buying whatever was out of fashion or which was most undervalued often did more poorly than picking the popular names, especially in years like 2021. When inferior performance is rewarded and careful analysis is not, investors will naturally pile into whatever is "doing well" regardless of merit. Even assets with essentially zero value like cryptocurrencies became highly desired because they were going up.

Most investors have been piling into U.S. large-cap equity growth funds in 2023 at an even more intense pace than during 2021, which at that time had set a record for greater total net calendar year inflows than 2001 through 2020 combined.

2021 experienced by far the highest total net inflows into U.S. equity funds in history even if you adjust generously for inflation. 2022 would have been an all-time record except for 2021. Not learning anything from their mistakes, 2023 has shown greater average daily net inflows into U.S. stock funds than either 2021 or 2022. The following article highlights this astonishing phenomenon of supreme overconfidence at the worst possible time:

Retail Investors Are Pouring a Record 1.5 Billion [U.S.] Dollars Per Day Into the Stock Market

Many baby boomers know they didn't save nearly enough to enjoy a comfortable retirement. Now that these folks are mostly in their 60s and 70s, they have been hoping that the stock market's gains will magically compensate for their savings shortage.

Millions of baby boomers didn't save anywhere close to the amount they knew they would need to retire comfortably. They have adopted the Boglehead philosophy that they have a divine right to come out ahead, and have therefore ignored compelling alternatives. More importantly, far too many investors of all ages haven't been reducing risk by moving into guaranteed U.S. Treasury bills and similar insured time deposits. Most people have no idea why it matters that large-cap U.S. stocks are still mostly trading at more than double fair value based upon their future profitability.

Now that U.S. Treasuries have been paying close to 5% with zero risk and zero state and local income taxes, a small minority of investors have been intelligently accumulating these since last summer. Tragically, far more investors are actually more confident about the U.S. stock market after experiencing a losing year like 2022, because they figure that was the one bad year of the decade and they'll get even bigger gains from now on. The media have been encouraging this sort of behavior, reporting that something like 90% of all down years for U.S. stocks are followed by up years. The problem is that 100% of all the first years of bubble collapses are followed by down years, and since we had experienced all-time record overvaluations, net inflows, and insider selling in 2021, the current scenario cannot be anything other than a bubble collapse.

The longest bull markets are followed by the lengthiest bear markets in a simple case of Newton's Third Law applied to investing.

The longest bear market in U.S. history was from September 1929 through July 1932, or 34 months. This was preceded by a bull market from August 1921 through September 1929 which was over 8 years. The second-longest bear market in U.S. history of 31 months occurred from March 2000 through October 2002 when QQQ had plummeted 83.6%. This had been preceded by a bull market from October 1990 through March 2000 which lasted for more than nine years.

The most recent bull market extended from March 6, 2009, when the S&P 500 had slid to 666.79, followed by the final peak on January 4, 2022 when the S&P 500 topped out at 4818.62. This was nearly 13 years altogether. Therefore, the current bear market is going to be a lengthy and severe one, perhaps lasting into 2025, and with the S&P 500 Index likely losing more than 70% of its peak valuation.

History always repeats itself with minor variations.

In any true bear market the S&P 500 moves below its previous bull-market top. Prior to early 2022 the most recent bull-market top for the S&P 500 had been 1576.09 on October 11, 2007. Therefore this index will have to drop below such a level sooner or later, although there is no way in advance to know when or by how much.

You have to adjust intelligently to everything in life, not just investing.

Imagine that you are a frequent sailboat racer. You adopt the following approach in every single race: within seconds of the official start, you hoist the spinnaker to go full speed ahead in a straight line toward your target. You don't care how the winds are blowing, or what the other boats are doing, or anything about the capabilities and personalities of their crews. It's always a direct all-or-nothing rush toward the finish. You have concluded that tacking (playing defense in unfavorable or shifting wind conditions), observing what other sailors are doing, or anything other than a straight-ahead approach is an irrelevant distraction.

No serious sailor would do this except on rare occasions. Unless the wind is firmly at your back and everything should be full speed ahead, you have to keep adjusting your strategy depending upon the conditions, what the competitors are planning, what you know they're likely to do based upon their past history, and dozens of other considerations. You don't wear the same clothing on a sweltering day in July as you do during a blizzard in January. Therefore, why would you want to invest with blinders on and zero consideration for the prevailing conditions?

While the stock market's long-term upward direction is a meaningful force, mean regression from a rare extreme is a far more powerful force. Whenever any asset is dangerously overpriced it will inevitably collapse before it resumes its next rally.

A married couple I have known for many years love to tell me how they remain nearly fully invested in U.S. large-cap passive equity funds at all times, no matter what the market is doing, as though I'll reward them with bones for being such faithful dogs.

Whenever I meet a certain lovely couple whom I've known for many years, the first thing they tell me is how they're staying the course no matter what and refusing to alter their asset allocation. These are folks who know they're on the Titanic and they've hit an iceberg, and the ship is probably sinking, but they're going to refuse the lifeboats and keep singing bravely on into the unknown. They're already starting to take on water, but their foolish consistency and pride will always trump their common sense.

It's better to be confused than to be wrongly overconfident.

Those who are baffled when the market has been more volatile or disappointing than usual might sell some of their stocks and reduce their risk because they don't understand what's happening. Those who are supremely confident that they have to come out ahead in the long run will keep buying, and buying, and buying, and will eventually lose a lot more than their counterparts. Being unsure is far superior to a false certainty.

Top U.S. corporate insiders have been persistently selling into rallies for more than two years. Since February 2021, insiders set a new all-time record for insider selling relative to insider buying.

Just as average investors have never been more aggressively buying large-cap U.S. equity index funds, top corporate insiders have never demonstrated a higher ratio of selling to buying in U.S. dollar terms than they have done for more than two years. These are the same executives who made all-time record purchases near major market bottoms including 2002-2003 and 2008-2009, and who no doubt will eventually become even more aggressive in accumulating shares of their companies.

However, insiders haven't been making purchases in any notable way since their massive buying spree of March 2020, even near the lowest points of 2021-2023. Therefore, the U.S. stock market has a very long way to go to the downside. Once insiders become heavy buyers it will be time to buy also, but it would be absurd to want to front-run those who know the most about the financial markets.

U.S. Treasury bills provide nearly 5% risk-free interest which is free of state and local income taxes.

A month ago, most U.S. Treasury bills were yielding over 5%. Now that we had the U.S. bank crisis, some investors have taken their money out of banks to put into U.S. Treasuries which has pushed their yields below 5% across the board. These are still well worth buying and I participate in all auctions of 8, 17, 26, and 52 weeks as well as those of 2 and 3 years.

Here's a little secret with U.S. Treasuries: hardly anyone knows about the 17-week U.S. Treasury which was only introduced in October 2022 when the U.S. government needed to increase its net borrowing. Some brokers including TD Ameritrade don't even offer this maturity to its customers, while older computer systems haven't added it to its inventory. You will therefore often get a higher yield on the 17-week U.S. Treasury than on other maturities including 13-week and 26-week; the March 22, 2023 17-week U.S. Treasury auction yielded an investment rate of 4.964%.

TLT sounds like a boring fund of U.S. Treasuries, but I expect it to gain more than 50% including all monthly dividends over the next two years.

Longer-term U.S. Treasury bonds and their funds including TLT suffered substantial losses in 2022, followed by a moderate recovery since then. TLT became so undervalued that, even if you don't count its rebound from its 11-year bottom in October 2022 until today, it will likely gain another 50% or more (including all monthly dividends) over the next two years. Usually investors don't think of U.S. Treasuries as being so volatile, but they were by far the biggest winners of all sectors in 2008.

Precious metals will likely correct for several weeks or more, but will thereafter become among the top performers of the 2020s.

Gold bullion recently briefly surpassed two thousand U.S. dollars per troy ounce. Historically moves above each exact multiple of one thousand have generated lots of excitement among the wrong investors, meaning those with the least experience who are most susceptible to chasing after trends which have already nearly fully matured. Therefore, I expect pullbacks for most assets related to precious metals until we reach some kind of important higher lows this spring or summer.

Over a longer-term basis, bubbles for large-cap U.S. equity growth shares are consistently followed by gains of hundreds of percent for gold mining and silver mining shares during subsequent years. There is a key parallel with the previous bubble peak for the S&P 500: in both cases, gold mining shares began to rally eight months after the top in the S&P 500. The March 2000 zenith was followed by a rally for gold/silver mining shares which started in November 2000; the January 2022 peak for the S&P 500 Index was similarly followed by September 2022 start for the long-term uptrends for GDXJ, GDX, ASA, and similar securities which had all lost more than half their value from their August 2020 peaks (a critical time to sell them) while retreating to 2-1/2-year lows.

VIX has continued to provide the most reliable signal telling us when to sell short during the current U.S. equity bear market.

Some market signals have an inconsistent record or send false messages, but fortunately VIX is spot on. Since 2021 VIX has told us precisely when to sell short QQQ and related large-cap passive U.S. equity growth funds. Whenever VIX is near 20 and especially whenever it is below 19, you get the green light for selling short large-cap passive U.S. equity funds including QQQ and XLK. The reason this works repeatedly is that a depressed level for VIX in a bear market tells us loudly and clearly that there exists a dangerous environment of complacency and a widespread misguided belief that, usually due to a recent extended stock-market rebound, the bear market is probably over. During the 2000-2003 and 2007-2009 U.S. equity bear markets we heard similar repeated pronouncements about the bear market being over, with some analysts making such a statement a dozen times or more within a few years and being wrong each time.

As has always been the case in past bear markets, whenever the downtrends for QQQ, the S&P 500, and similar funds and indices really are over, you won't be hearing about it in the media. Instead, almost everyone will be asking how much lower the market still has to go to the downside.

In recent months I had added to short positions in XLV, XLE, and XLI. More recently I have been adding to my short positions in QQQ and SMH whenever VIX is near 20 or lower.

Investors tend to be mesmerized by the "recency bias": whenever a given asset has been enjoying an extended uptrend most people take for granted that additional gains will follow, whereas protracted downturns cause people to conclude that additional losses will soon occur. This is where tracking VIX, insider activity, fund flows, and traders' commitments has a huge advantage. You will get reliable forecasts while most investors are overly reliant upon the recent past continuing into the indefinite future.

If you're not sure about whether or not we're in a U.S. equity bear market, check to see if women's clothing length has been extended to the feet--amazingly this signal has been accurate for over a century:

Maxi Skirts Are Everywhere

Here are some useful charts which illustrate the above points.

The following chart shows that for more than a century an unusually low spread between corporate bond yields and U.S. Treasury yields signals a major decline for the U.S. stock market, while an especially high spread precedes the biggest rallies in percentage terms:

We have also experienced unprecedented buying of call options in 2023 even when compared with previous all-time record speculative call buying in 2021 and parts of 2022:

The traders' commitments for all U.S. Treasuries, including the 30-year and 5-year maturities shown below, have demonstrated commercial accumulation (equivalent to insider buying for futures by those who are trading any given security as part of their career) which is near their highest percentiles ever recorded:

The bottom line: we have two crushing down years still ahead for U.S. assets including especially large-cap growth stocks, high-yield corporate bonds, real estate, art, and other collectibles.

Why did the Fed wait at least a year too long before raising the overnight lending rates? It was primarily due to the foolish conclusion that, since we hadn't experienced above-average inflation for decades, it couldn't reoccur. Don't make the mistake of thinking that, since we haven't suffered a severe U.S. equity bear market since March 2009, it is somehow less likely to happen. Exactly the opposite is true as this extended period without a real decline has psychologically caused most people to believe that it won't occur again at least in their lifetimes, thereby causing valuations for U.S. stocks and real estate to be near or above double fair value and higher than that for many large-cap U.S. growth shares.

Don't live in a house without a roof. Protecting against adversity is far more important than stretching for dangerous additional gains.

Disclosure of current holdings:

Here is my current asset allocation as of the close on Wednesday, March 22, 2023:

TIAA(Traditional)/VMFXX/FZDXX/FZFXX/SPRXX/Savings/Checking long: 33.63%;

XLK short (all shorts currently unhedged): 20.36%;

QQQ short: 7.70%;

XLE short: 4.29%;

XLI short: 2.28%;

XLV short: 1.51%;

SMH short: 0.67%;

GDXJ long: 10.74%;

ASA long: 6.64%;

GDX long: 2.95%;

BGEIX long: 1.45%;

2-Year/3-Year/52-Week/26-Week/13-Week/5,10-Year TIPS long: 12.56%;

TLT long: 9.33%;

I Bonds long: 9.31%;

Gold/silver/platinum coins: 5.86%;

HBI long: 0.27%;

EWZ long: 0.07%;

EWZS long: 0.04%;

PAK long: 0.01%;

EGPT long: 0.01%.

The numbers add up to more than 100% because short positions only require 30% collateral in stocks/funds and less than that in U.S. Treasuries (by SEC regulations; some brokers require more) to hold them with no margin required.